|
|
Ideas
|
|
submitted by
Raiden78
2 years, 8 months ago
— Many traders have a strong desire to keep account funds in currencies other than the USD, particularly EUR and CHF. I know many traders would give MBT a try if this feature was offered. read more...
12 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 33
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
Boham
2 years, 8 months ago
— Currently the only way to fund accounts or make withdrawals is via wire transfer or check. Other brokers are now offering the ability to "debit" funds or transer electronically. This is a very widely used feature in other areas, why do I need to drive to the bank and sit in the bankers office for 15 - 25 minutes to carry out a wire transer when I can do so from my trade desk electronically? read more...
11 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 27
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
Gridking
2 years, 3 months ago
— I would like to use formula using symbol $Tick
The chart ends January 15 2010 , I called and submitted a bug report
also: in formula study how does one reference $TICK as a symbol it comes back as not recognized - tried quotes, parenthesis , single quotes
Thank You read more...
11 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 17
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
markettimer
2 years, 5 months ago
— I would rather see the price I paid for a stock under Basis column in the Positions window, not what the close was yesterday (ever changing). Isn't that what Basis means - what one paid for an item.? I then can see what my profit/loss is from the time I opened the position instead of going somewhere else. It's nice to know what my P/L is for today, but more important to know what the total is. Maybe you can add it to the Add/Remove Columns..., so one has a choice. read more...
11 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 7
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
bc_varney
8 months, 29 days ago
— Suggestion: Change the Market depth window from a typed in window to a pulldown window.
Problem: The market depth does not have a pulldown symbol window. Currently to change the symbol it must be typed into the maket depth window. (The charts and main platform have a pulldown symbol windows but, Market depth does not. )
Why it’s a problem. If charts space are maximized then the market depth must be placed at the edges. Time is lost when the trader has to manually type in the symbol or cursor to a location where there is a pulldown window.
Why it is needed: Sometime the trader wants to quickly move from pair to pair without leaving the order entry area. Time conservation and focus is desired. A pulldown window better achieves this.
read more...
11 comments
|
category: MBTDesktopPro | Views: 10
|
|
tags:
navpro | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
Synchro
1 year, 4 months ago
— How about adding a few more drawing tools to the Desktop Pro charts? Chart markers like arrows or other eye catching symbols that can be used to point at certain bars. Or perhaps user selectable symbols from a font set like Wing Dings. Also circles or squares that can be dragged, dropped and sized to use for highlighting are much needed. Freehand drawing would work pretty well for both of these needs and would be great if nothing else is possible. A ruler to measure the size of a move in ticks is also a great tool.
Thanks! Love what you have done so far. read more...
11 comments
|
category: MBTDesktopPro | Views: 35
|
|
tags:
navpro | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
DarkPool_SDT
1 year, 2 months ago
— I would really like to see this feature implemented.
The ability to set any order size by percentage of account equity versus numer of lots. The MAT tool has this function, and I have used that window to trade, but it is clunky for an active trader. read more...
11 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 5
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
lk3000
9 months, 13 days ago
— I am a new account user. I am frustrated beacuse there are no support available to use you system. I cannot place an order and there is no-one available, after 5 est to assist. read more...
10 comments
|
category: General | Views: 39
|
|
tags:
general | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
Crassius
3 months, 8 days ago
— I'll try to explain this in as few words as possible, but still be clear. In 11.8.0.38 MB added a feature that allows us to toggle between price, currency and pips as the Unit To Use for Stop and Limit Values.
See the release notes with illustrations here:
http://www.mbtrading.com/mbtDesktop.aspx
This is a great addition because it allows for very quick limit order entry as I can set it to enter an order 1 pip above or below the market, and the field will populate automatically the streaming quotes then calculate one pip above or below whatever the quote is whenever I hit the buy/sell button. This quick order entry encoourages one to use limit oders, because you don't have to fuss entering the price as it quickly changes. We want lots of people using limit orders to increase liquidity on the EXN.
However, once you make one entry in the above manner, the field visually updates with the current quote, but now if you hit buy/sell, it will enter a limit order 1 pip above/below the current trade basis, not the current market price. I may be adding to an order that has already moved 10 pips in my favor. I want to enter a limit order that is 1 pip away from the market NOT my basis, which is now 10 pips away from the market.
Sometimes it seems to work as I desire on a second order, other times it enters an order 1 pip away from the basis... I think it depends on if the added trade moves the basis toward or away from the first entry price, but I haven't figured out exactly when it works or doesn't.... that's my best guess. Since I am trading real money, I haven't tested enough to nail down exctly when it does enter a new order 1 pip away from the current price, and when it enters a new order 1 pip away from the trade basis. I have gotten in the habit of entering the first leg via a limit order offset 1 pip as above, then switching to market order entry so I don't have to cancel an order and then enter a new one if it uses basis instead of current price.
Please have a look at this so that we can have as much liquidity on the EXN as possible by encouraging limit orders by making them as fast and easy to enter as possible.
read more...
10 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 15
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
teezla
2 years, 5 months ago
— When changing the Microsoft Sans Serif font size, the resulting font size is not what was selected in the preferences. I found I had to select a font size two sizes smaller in order to get the displayed size I wanted.
read more...
9 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 13
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
ross_ditlove
2 years, 6 months ago
— This was the thread discussing a "thank you" from a client as well as a discussion from a poster who thought our $8.95 trades for bulletin boards stocks were to expensive and preventing profits. I mistakenly deleted the thread so I invite everyone to re-post if they so choose. I will however post the reply to the previous poster. Sorry gang.
Ross read more...
9 comments
|
category: General | Views: 20
|
|
tags:
general | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
BamaPete
1 year, 8 months ago
— I would use the Navigator's quotes for stocks if it had a column for average daily volume. It has a column for intraday volume, but that is useless to me if I can't compare a stock's current intraday volume to its average daily volume for past 50 days or so. This weekend I upgraded to latest Navigator and was disappointed to see that avg. daily volume is still not available. In the past dozen years I have used four other brokers other than MB in addtition to Quote Tracker, and they ALL have avg. daily volume.
Otherwise I have been extremely happy with MB Trading and continue to be a very loyal customer.
Pete read more...
9 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 39
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
spence2
2 years, 8 months ago
— Consider the following: 1. the borders to entry for trading are not limited by geographical location and 2. that the European population is over 800 million. Many MB clients in Europe, the Middle East and Asia are subject to connectivity lags which are vital to trading. There are no online brokers that I know of that have a server in Europe. It might prove to be a huge advantage for MB in attracting new clients and keeping existing traders by becoming the first provider to put up a server in Europe. read more...
|
|
| tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
No tags
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
alice_in_lexington
4 months, 11 days ago
— For folks using the SDK, you need to 2 logins: one for use with Desktop Pro and the other for use with your program. The problem is if you ever try to use the same login for Desktop Pro and your program, the last one in will die silently. So if you are running your program and have logged in, then you try to fire up Desktop Pro and login with the same login, Desktop Pro will just go away. No error message. No warning. It just disappears. Similarly, if you have Desktop Pro loaded and you try to run your program and login, your program will just end without warning.
If you cannot let users login to Desktop Pro and their programs with the same login, could you please pop up an error message indicating this if and when they try (because they will). So if you are logged into your program and you try to load Desktop Pro and login with the same login, please show an error message indicating "Login ID already in use. Please use a different login" or something similar. read more...
9 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 8
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
|
submitted by
futurescalper
1 year, 1 month ago
—
Hi,
I made this suggestion in the MB Trading API forum, but I don't see it, so I assume the moderator may have vetoed it. Anyway, I was encouraged to put the suggestion here, so that those "up to the CEO" could read it !!
This is an important issue for API developers, those using the SDK to automate access to MB Trading's systems.
LOGIN CONFLICT
The simple default situation involves a single set of credentials: user1234/password5678
Using your Desktop software, you cannot log in twice. Well, probably no one wants to log in twice with the Desktop software, and that's not normally the real issue.
THE ISSUE is that software which logs in using the API (aka SDK) will not be allowed to do so with the same credentials. The credentials are in Conflict, and if the API software uses those credentials, I think the Desktop will be forcibly LOGGED OUT. I think if the API got in first with the credentials, that a Desktop login would forcibly disconnect the API connection.
In simple terms, any login with the credentials "burns up" a login slot, and no other login can take place concurrently.
(For the moment, let's set aside the possibility of paying for additional logins, which is a hassle and which doesn't really address the issue very well anyway.)
I PROPOSE THAT users who use the API are given login credentials which are NON-CONFLICTING with other logins. So they are identified as a different type of login.
Also, I propose that a small number of these NON-CONFLICTING CONCURRENT "API" logins be permitted when the API is being used.
Credentials issued for API logins would need to be identified as such, as distinct from "human" client logins, and would NOT CONFLICT with a "human" login. So there would be two CATEGORIES of login credentials: "human" and "api or automated".
Given the ability to classifiy the login by type, then MB could implement different policies for "human" vs "automated" logins to their systems.
I'd propose the policy be something like this, and there are several possible ways of doing this. I'll put the BEST option first, and then mention oth read more...
9 comments
|
category: Implemented | Views: 28
|
|
tags:
implemented | tag it
Everyones tags: | Your tags: | |
|
|
|
|
Submit new ideas and feature requests to MB Trading, or vote for your favorites.
Idea categories:
|